Predictors of Fatigue After Treatment for Prostate Cancer

Published in: Urology, v. 65, no. 1, Jan. 2005, p. 101-108

Posted on RAND.org on January 01, 2005

by Sally L. Maliski, Lorna Kwan, James R. Orecklin, Christopher S. Saigal, Mark Litwin

Read More

Access further information on this document at www.sciencedirect.com

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate whether post-treatment fatigue among men treated for prostate cancer varies by treatment, demographics, or pretreatment general and disease-specific health-related quality of life. The authors also sought to describe the baseline characteristics of men who were fatigued at follow-up to allow for interventions in those at greatest risk. METHODS: The authors conducted a secondary analysis on data gathered from men with prostate cancer at biopsy and after treatment by examining factors that predicted for post-treatment fatigue. RESULTS: Univariate and multivariate analysis results demonstrated that post-treatment fatigue was associated with baseline fatigue, role limitations due to emotional problems, treatment type, and treatment location. RESULTS: Univariate analysis showed that those who were fatigued at follow-up were more likely to have been treated at a public facility (P = 0.0017), be nonwhite (Latino, African American, or Asian Pacific-Islander; P = 0.0362), be married (P = 0.0413), be not employed at least part-time (P = 0.0327), to have one or more comorbidities (P = 0.0005), and to have scored lower in all domains of the RAND 36-Item Health Survey and UCLA Prostate Cancer Index at baseline (all P

This report is part of the RAND Corporation external publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.