Cover: In Their Own Words

In Their Own Words

Lessons Learned from Those Exposed to Anthrax

Published In: American Journal of Public Health, v. 95, no. 3, Mar. 2005, p. 489-495

Posted on Jan 1, 2005

by Janice C. Blanchard, Yolanda Haywood, Bradley D. Stein, Terri Tanielian, Michael A. Stoto, Nicole Lurie

OBJECTIVES: The authors evaluated perceptions of workers at the US Postal Service Brentwood Processing and Distribution Center and US Senate employees regarding public health responses to the anthrax mailings of October 2001. They generated recommendations for improving responses to bioterrorism on the basis of the perceptions we recorded. METHODS: Transcripts from focus groups conducted with Brentwood and US Senate employees were examined, and qualitative analysis identified common domains. RESULTS: Brentwood focus groups consisted of 36 participants (97% African American and 19% hearing impaired). US Senate focus groups consisted of 7 participants (71% White and 0% hearing impaired). The focus groups revealed that participantsb2s trust in public health agencies had eroded and that this erosion could threaten the effectiveness of communication during future public health emergencies. Among Brentwood participants, lack of trust involved the perception that unfair treatment on the basis of race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status had occurred; among US Senate participants, it derived from perceptions of inconsistent and disorganized messages. CONCLUSIONS: Effective communication during a public health emergency depends on the provision of clear messages and close involvement of the affected community. Diverse populations may require individualized approaches to ensure that messages are delivered appropriately. Special attention should be given to those who face barriers to traditional modes of communication.

This report is part of the RAND external publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.