Case-mix Adjustment of the CAHPS Hospital Survey

Published in: Health Services Research, v. 40, no. 6, pt. 2, Dec. 2005, p. 2162-2181

Posted on RAND.org on January 01, 2005

by A. James O'Malley, Alan M. Zaslavsky, Marc N. Elliott, Lawrence Zaborski, Paul Cleary

Read More

Access further information on this document at www.blackwell-synergy.com

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

OBJECTIVES: To develop a model for case-mix adjustment of Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS) Hospital survey responses, and to assess the impact of adjustment on comparisons of hospital quality. Data Sources: Survey of 19,720 patients discharged from 132 hospitals. METHODS: The authors analyzed CAHPS Hospital survey data to assess the extent to which patient characteristics predict patient ratings (predictive power) and the heterogeneity of the characteristics across hospitals. The authors combined the measures to estimate the impact of each predictor (impact factor) and selected high impact variables for adjusting ratings from the CAHPS Hospital survey. PRINCIPLE FINDINGS: The most important case-mix variables are: hospital service (surgery, obstetric, medical), age, race (non-Hispanic black), education, general health status (GHS), speaking Spanish at home, having a circulatory disorder, and interactions of each of these variables with service. Adjustment for GHS and education affected scores in each of the three services, while age and being non-Hispanic black had important impacts for those receiving surgery or medical services. Circulatory disorder, Spanish language, and Hispanic affected scores for those treated on surgery, obstetrics, and medical services, respectively. Of the 20 medical conditions we tested, only circulatory problems had an important impact within any of the services. Results were consistent for the overall ratings of nurse, doctor, and hospital. Although the overall impact of case-mix adjustment is modest, the rankings of some hospitals may be substantially affected. CONCLUSIONS: Case-mix adjustment has a small impact on hospital ratings, but can lead to important reductions in the bias in comparisons between hospitals.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation External publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit www.rand.org/about/principles.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.