Incremental Cost-Effectiveness of a Collaborative Care Intervention for Panic Disorder
Published in: Psychological Medicine, v. 36, no. 3, Mar. 2006, p. 353-363
Posted on RAND.org on January 01, 2006
BACKGROUND: Panic disorder is a prevalent, often disabling, disorder among primary-care patients, but there are large gaps in quality of treatment in primary care. This study describes the incremental cost-effectiveness of a combined cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) and pharmacotherapy intervention for patients with panic disorder versus usual primary-care treatment. METHOD: This randomized control trial recruited 232 primary-care patients meeting DSM-IV criteria for panic disorder from March 2000 to March 2002 from six primary-care clinics from university-affiliated clinics at the University of Washington (Seattle) and University of California (Los Angeles and San Diego). Patients were randomly assigned to receive either treatment as usual or a combined CBT and pharmacotherapy intervention for panic disorder delivered in primary care by a mental health therapist. Intervention patients had up to six sessions of CBT modified for the primary-care setting in the first 12 weeks, and up to six telephone follow-ups over the next 9 months. The primary outcome variables were total out-patient costs, anxiety-free days (AFDs) and quality adjusted life-years (QALYs). RESULTS: Relative to usual care, intervention patients experienced 60.4 [95% confidence interval (CI) 184.108.40.206] more AFDs over a 12-month period. Total incremental out-patient costs were $492 higher (95% CI $236.747) in intervention versus usual care patients with a cost per additional AFD of $8.40 (95% CI $220.127.116.11) and a cost per QALY ranging from $14158 (95% CI $6791-21496) to $24776 (95% CI $11885-37618). The cost per QALY estimate is well within the range of other commonly accepted medical interventions such as statin use and treatment of hypertension. CONCLUSIONS: The combined CBT and pharmacotherapy intervention was associated with a robust clinical improvement compared to usual care with a moderate increase in ambulatory costs.