Reminders and Suggestions from Personality Science

Published in: Applied Psychology, v. 55, no. 3, July 2006, p. 333-385

Posted on on January 01, 2006

by Daniel Cervone, Daniel Cervone, William G. Shadel, Ronald E. Smith, Marina Fiori

Read More

Access further information on this document at

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

The self-regulation literature commonly is said to lack theoretical order. This paper explores the possibility that advances in personality science may foster clarity in this literature. Our goals are two-fold. The authors remind readers of conceptual distinctions that are central to contemporary personality science, that are necessary to the attainment of theoretical order in the self-regulation literature, yet that sometimes are overlooked. Secondly, the authors suggest that basic and applied students of self-regulation would profit by capitalising on recent advances in personality science that explore intra-individual personality structure and dynamics. The authors review theory and research on the architecture of intra-individual personality systems and applications of this work to three domains: health, clinical, and work/industrial/organisation psychology.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation External publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.