Impact of Patient Volume on the Mortality Rate of Adult Intensive Care Unit Patients

Published in: Critical Care Medicine, v. 34, no. 7, July 2006, p. 1925-1934

Posted on RAND.org on January 01, 2006

by Laurent G. Glance, Yue Li, Turner M. Osler, Andrew W. Dick, Dana B. Mukamel

Read More

Access further information on this document at www.ccmjournal.com

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

OBJECTIVE: Expert task forces have proposed that adult critical care medicine services should be regionalized in order to improve outcomes. However, it is currently unknown if high intensive care unit (ICU) patient volumes are associated with reduced mortality rate. The objective was to investigate whether high-volume ICUs have better mortality outcomes than low-volume ICUs. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study analyzing the association between ICU volume and in-hospital mortality using Project IMPACT (a clinical outcomes database created by the Society of Critical Care Medicine). PATIENTS: The analyses were based on 70,757 patients admitted to 92 ICUs between 2001 and 2003. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The main outcome measure was in-hospital mortality. Hierarchical logistic regression modeling was used to examine the volume-outcome association. The median (interquartile range) ICU volume was 827 (631-1,234) patient admissions per year. The overall mortality rate was 14.6%. After controlling for patient risk factors and ICU characteristics, and clustering, there was evidence that patients admitted to high-volume ICUs had improved outcomes (p = .025). However, this mortality benefit was seen only in high-risk patients treated at ICUs treating high volumes of high-risk patients. CONCLUSIONS: There is evidence that high ICU patient volumes are associated with lower mortality rates in high-risk critically ill adults.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation External publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit www.rand.org/about/principles.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.