Marginal Cost of Emergency Department Outpatient Visits
An Update Using California Data
Published in: Medical Care, v. 44, no. 9, Sep. 2006, p. 835-841
Posted on RAND.org on January 01, 2006
OBJECTIVE: The authors sought to clarify the importance of time frame in the measurement of marginal cost and to provide marginal cost estimates for outpatient emergency department (ED) visits that better reflect current economic conditions. DATA SOURCES: Analyses are based upon data that California hospitals report to the Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development (OSHPD). The time period covered was 1990 through 1998. Hospitals without EDs, or hospitals designated as trauma centers, were excluded from the analysis. STUDY DESIGN: Nine years of panel data were used to estimate hospital cost functions, which were then used to test for economies of scale and to derive estimates of both short- and long-run marginal costs (excluding the physician expense component). PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: The authors found only weak evidence in favor of scale economies and, in that context, they argue that long-run marginal costs should be the preferred metric for judging the cost of treating outpatient ED visitors. The authors estimate these long-run costs (in 1998 dollars) to be roughly $348 per visit for large urban hospitals, $288 for other urban hospitals, $203 for rural hospitals, and $314 overall. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that the marginal cost of an outpatient ED visit is larger than is commonly believed. A key implication of this finding is that hospital administrators need to think more carefully about their nonurgent care policies, especially as they pertain to ED operations.
This report is part of the RAND Corporation External publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.
The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.