Supporting Wellness Through Policy and Advocacy

A Case History of a Working Group in a Community Partnership Initiative to Address Depression

Published in: Ethnicity and Disease, v. 16, no. 1, suppl. 1, Winter 2006, p. S1-43-S1-53

Posted on RAND.org on January 01, 2006

by Susan Stockdale, Kavita Patel, Ruthie Gray, Delores A. Hill, Charla Franklin, Nisaa Madyun

Read More

Access further information on this document at www.ishib.org

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

This paper describes the implementation of a collaborative project with community and academic partners in Los Angeles, focusing on the experiences of the Supporting Wellness (SW) working group in a depression outreach/ education initiative (the Witness for Wellness project). The first-year activities of the SW group involved infrastructure development to prepare for policy and advocacy work. Scribe notes from monthly meetings along with the authors' observations are the primary source of data for this article. One of the major accomplishments of the group was to obtain a position on a countywide stakeholder committee that makes recommendations to policymakers on mental health spending for the county. One significant challenge for the academic group members has been providing guidance and support for potential research projects. Although community partnerships with academia are a potentially useful approach for developing health interventions to address community needs and priorities, the experiences of this group illustrate that a substantial amount of time is required to develop the infrastructure for efforts to be successful. In addition, the authors learned the community perspective is essential to developing interventions that can address barriers to depression care that are unique to communities with high numbers of under-served, unserved, and inappropriately served residents.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation External publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit www.rand.org/about/principles.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.