Building an Academic-Community Partnered Network for Clinical Services Research

The Community Health Improvement Collaborative (CHIC)

Published in: Ethnicity & Disease, v. 16, no. 1, suppl. 1, Winter 2006, p. S1-3-S1-17

Posted on RAND.org on January 01, 2006

by Kenneth B. Wells, Anne D. Staunton, Keith C. Norris, Ricky N. Bluthenthal, Bowen Chung, Lillian Gelberg, Loretta Jones, Sheryl H. Kataoka, Paul Koegel, Jeanne Miranda, et al.

Read More

Access further information on this document at www.ishib.org

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

OBJECTIVE: Community-based participatory research is recommended for research on health disparities and to improve uptake of clinical research findings. The authors describe the development of a multicenter consortium designed to support a community agency-academic partner infrastructure to support community-based, health-services research on multiple sources of health and healthcare disparities in local communities. DESIGN: The authors describe the development of the Los Angeles Community Health Improvement Collaborative (CHIC). RESULTS: The CHIC partners examined the research capacity and health priorities of its partners and developed a research agenda focused on four tracer conditions (depression, violence, diabetes, and obesity) and four areas for development of research capacity: public participation in all phases of research; understanding community and organizational context for clinical services interventions; practical clinical services trial methods; and advancing health information technology for clinical services research. The partners pooled resources to develop these areas for the tracer conditions. CONCLUSIONS: The challenges of a participatory approach to community-based clinical services research go beyond the significant methodologic and operational issues for specific projects and include building a sustainable capacity for research, community programs, and partnership across diverse communities and stakeholder organizations even when funding sources are not fully aligned with these goals.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation External publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit www.rand.org/about/principles.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.