Hospital Competition, Managed Care, and Mortality After Hospitalization for Medical Conditions: Evidence from Three States

Published in: Medical Care Research and Review, v. 63, no. 6, suppl., Dec. 2006, p. 112S-40S

Posted on on December 31, 2005

by Jose J. Escarce, Arvind Jain, Jeannette Rogowski

Read More

Access further information on this document at Medical Care Research and Review

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

This study assessed the effect of hospital competition and HMO penetration on mortality after hospitalization for six medical conditions in California, New York, and Wisconsin. The authors used linked hospital-discharge and vital-statistics data to study adults hospitalized for myocardial infarction, hip fracture, stroke, gastrointestinal hemorrhage, congestive heart failure, or diabetes. The authors estimated logistic regression models with death within 30 days of admission as the dependent variable and hospital competition, HMO penetration, and hospital and patient characteristics as explanatory variables. Higher hospital competition was associated with lower mortality in California and New York but not Wisconsin. Higher HMO penetration was associated with lower mortality in California but higher mortality in New York. These findings suggest that hospitals in highly competitive markets compete on quality even in the absence of mature managed-care markets. The findings also underscore the need to consider geographic effects in studies of market structure and hospital quality.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation External publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.