Perspectives on Therapeutic Treatment from Adolescent Probationers

Published in: Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, v. 38, no. 4, Dec. 2006, p. 461-471

Posted on RAND.org on January 01, 2006

by Ricky N. Bluthenthal, Kara Riehman, Lisa H. Jaycox, Andrew R. Morral

Read More

Access further information on this document at Journal of Psychoactive Drugs

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

Little is known about youths' experiences in residential adolescent treatment programs. To better understand the experiences of youth in such programs, the authors conducted a longitudinal qualitative study of 10 juvenile probationers in an adolescent therapeutic community (TC) treatment setting. Seven boys and three girls were recruited into the study upon their entry into the TC. Ages ranged from 14 to 17 years old; six youths were Hispanic, three were White, and one was African-American. Each participant completed between two and six audio-recorded interviews over the course of two years. We report on youth experiences in the TC as well as after discharge or drop out. Three issues were most salient in these interviews-the positive and negative influence of peers, youth appreciation of the family counseling component, and the need for improved methods to prevent running away from the program. Regarding running away, half of the youth in our sample who ran away regretted it, suggesting that with more focused intervention some of them might have been retained in the program.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation External publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit www.rand.org/about/research-integrity.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.