Did the Medicare Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility Prospective Payment System Result in Changes in Relative Patient Severity and Relative Resource Use?

Published in: Medical Care, v. 45, no. 2, Feb. 2007, p. 123-130

by Susan M. Paddock, Jose J. Escarce, Orla Hayden, Melinda Beeuwkes Buntin

Read More

Access further information on this document at Medical Care

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

BACKGROUND: The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services implemented a prospective payment system (PPS) in 2002 for care provided by inpatient rehabilitation facilities (IRFs) to Medicare beneficiaries. OBJECTIVE: The authors sought to examine changes in the composition of Medicare beneficiaries in IRFs by examining the percentages of patients having worse functional or health status than the average for their payment groups (relative severity) and of patients having greater cost or longer length of stay than the average for their payment groups (relative resource use) before versus after IRF PPS; to examine whether observed changes in relative resource use were expected given predicted changes; and to explore whether these effects varied by IRF Medicare volume. METHODS: In an observational study of indicators of Medicare beneficiary relative severity and relative resource use, we studied cases paid for by Medicare during 1999 and 2002 having an acute care stay preceding their IRF stay (n = 363,542 in 1999 and 446,002 in 2002). RESULTS: Similar percentages of cases had longer than expected lengths of stay, greater-than-expected costs per case, and worse-than-expected functional status pre- versus post-IRF PPS. Cases under the IRF PPS had lower predicted probabilities of death 150 days after admission. Although predicted relative resource use remained steady, observed relative resource use decreased after IRF PPS. CONCLUSIONS: IRF patient composition has not changed meaningfully for Medicare beneficiaries, but patients within payment groups are being provided less care, which could be attributable to the IRF PPS, existing trends in decreasing length of stay, or both.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation External publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit www.rand.org/about/research-integrity.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.