Does Ambulatory Process of Care Predict Health-Related Quality of Life Outcomes for Patients with Chronic Disease?

Published in: Health Services Research, v. 42, no. 1, Feb. 2007, p. 63-83

Posted on on February 01, 2007

by Katherine L. Kahn, Diana M. Tisnado, John L. Adams, Honghu H. Liu, Wen-Pin Chen, Fang Ashlee Hu, Carol Mangione, Ron D. Hays, Cheryl L. Damberg

Read More

Access further information on this document at Health Services Research

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

OBJECTIVE: The validity of quality of care measurement has important implications for practicing clinicians, their patients, and all involved with health care delivery. The authors used empirical data from managed care patients enrolled in west coast physician organizations to test the hypothesis that observed changes in health-related quality of life across a 2.5-year window reflected process of care. DATA SOURCES/STUDY SETTING: Patient self-report data as well as clinically detailed medical record review regarding 963 patients with chronic disease associated with managed care from three west coast states. Study DESIGN: Prospective cohort study of change in health-related quality of life scores across 30 months as measured by change in SF-12 physical component scores. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS: Patient self-report and medical record abstraction. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: The authors found a positive relationship between better process scores and higher burden of illness (p<.05). After adjustment for burden of illness, using an instrumental variables approach revealed better process is associated with smaller declines in SF-12 scores across a 30-month observation window (p=.014). The application of the best quartile of process of care to patients currently receiving poor process is associated with a 4.24 increment in delta SF-12-physical component summary scores. CONCLUSIONS: The use of instrumental variables allowed us to demonstrate a significant relationship between better ambulatory process of care and better health-related quality of life. This finding underscores the importance of efforts to improve the process of care.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation External publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.