The Risk-Benefit Balance in the United States

Who Decides?

Published in: Health Affairs, v. 26, no. 3, May-June. 2007, p. 625-635

Posted on on January 01, 2007

by John D. Graham, Jianhui Hu

Read More

Access further information on this document at

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

A health policy decision often requires a balancing of risks, costs, and benefits. In this paper the authors illustrate that there is no uniform answer in the United States to the question of who decides the risk-benefit balance. The authors use a wide range of case examples from medicine and public health to show the different approaches that are used to allocate decision-making responsibility. Our ultimate purpose is to urge the U.S. health policy community to develop a more consistent way of thinking about how risk-benefit decisions could be guided by general principles.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation External publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.