Rates and Types of Events Reported to Established Incident Reporting Systems in Two US Hospitals

Published in: Quality and Safety in Health Care, v. 16, no. 3, June 2007, p. 164-168

Posted on RAND.org on June 01, 2007

by Teryl K. Nuckols, Douglas S. Bell, Honghu H. Liu, Susan M. Paddock, Lee H. Hilborne

Read More

Access further information on this document at qshc.bmj.com

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

BACKGROUND: US hospitals have had voluntary incident reporting systems for many years, but the effectiveness of these systems is unknown. To facilitate substantial improvements in patient safety, the systems should capture incidents reflecting the spectrum of adverse events that are known to occur in hospitals. OBJECTIVE: To characterise the incidents from established voluntary hospital reporting systems. DESIGN: Observational study examining about 1000 reports of hospitalised patients at each of two hospitals. PATIENTS AND SETTING: 16 575 randomly selected patients from an academic and a community hospital in the US in 2001. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Rates of incidents reported per hospitalised patient and characteristics of reported incidents. RESULTS: 9% of patients had at least one reported incident; 17 incidents were reported per 1000 patient-days in hospital. Nurses filed 89% of reports, physicians 1.9% and other providers 8.9%. The most common types were medication incidents (29%), falls (14%), operative incidents (15%) and miscellaneous incidents (16%); 59% seemed preventable and preventability was not clear for 32%. Among the potentially preventable incidents, 43% involved nurses, 16% physicians and 19% other types of providers. Qualitative examination of reports indicated that very few involved prescribing errors or high-risk procedures. CONCLUSIONS: Hospital reporting systems receive many reports, but capture a spectrum of incidents that differs from the adverse events known to occur in hospitals, thereby substantially underdetecting physician incidents, particularly those involving operations, high-risk procedures and prescribing errors. Increasing the reporting of physician incidents will be essential to enhance the effectiveness of hospital reporting systems; therefore, barriers to reporting such incidents must be minimised.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation External publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit www.rand.org/about/research-integrity.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.