Approval of Syringe Exchange Programs in California

Results from a Local Approach to HIV Prevention

Published In: American Journal of Public Health, v. 198, no. 2, Feb. 1, 2008, p. 278-283

Posted on on January 01, 2008

by Ricky N. Bluthenthal, Keith G. Heinzerling, Rachel Anderson, Neil M. Flynn, Alex H. Kral

Read More

Access further information on this document at American Public Health Association

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

OBJECTIVES: The authors studied the effect of local approval of syringe exchange programs in California (through Assembly AB136) on program availability and performance. METHODS: The authors determined the number of active syringe exchange programs in California by conducting Internet searches and obtaining information from the state and from local programs. To track changes in program availability and performance between 2000 and 2002, we interviewed 24 program directors annually for 3 years about program characteristics, syringe exchange policies, law enforcement contact, and other issues. The authors conducted multivariate analyses to determine whether AB136 approval status was associated with changes in performance. RESULTS: Fifteen local governments (13 counties and 2 cities) enacted the new law by 2002, and operating syringe exchange programs increased from 24 to 35. The proportion of these programs that were not locally approved declined from 54% to 40%. No new approved programs were started in high-need counties. Total syringes exchanged increased by more than 1 million per year, average annual budgets increased by more than 50%, and police harassment of the program volunteers, clients, and operators declined. Improvements at approved syringe exchange programs accounted for these changes. CONCLUSIONS: Statewide approval and funding appears necessary to further syringe exchange availability in California.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation External publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.