Severity of Cardiovascular Disease and Health-Related Quality of Life in Men with Prostate Cancer

A Longitudinal Analysis from CaPSURE

Published In: Quality of Life Research, v. 17, no. 6, Aug. 2008, p. 845-855

Posted on on January 01, 2008

by Lonneke V. Van de Poll-Franse, Natalia Sadetsky, Lorna Kwan, Mark Litwin

Read More

Access further information on this document at Springer-Verlag Dordrecht

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the influence of comorbid cardiovascular disease severity on health-related quality of life (HRQL) in men treated with radical prostatectomy (RP) or radiotherapy (RT) for early stage prostate cancer. METHODS: Subjects (n = 830) with non-metastatic disease who had been diagnosed in 2000-2002 were drawn from Cancer of the Prostate Strategic Urologic Research Endeavor (CaPSURE). The authors evaluated the influence of cardiovascular disease (CVD) severity on generic and disease-specific HRQL before and 6, 12, 18, and 24 months after treatment with RP or RT. HRQL was measured with the SF-36 and the UCLA Prostate Cancer Index. RESULTS: Men with moderate (n = 193) or severe (n = 51) cardiovascular disease had worse pre-treatment HRQL than did men without CVD (n = 293) (P < 0.01); HRQL scores were worse in men referred for RT. During 24 months of follow-up, men with moderate or severe CVD had worse SF-36 physical and mental component summaries and worse bowel function at all time points (P < 0.05). Men with severe CVD also experienced a slower recovery in physical function (P = 0.03) and sexual functioning (P = 0.02) than did men without CVD. CONCLUSIONS: Prostate cancer patients with moderate to severe CVD have worse HRQL during follow-up. Those with severe CVD recover their physical and sexual functioning more slowly after treatment.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation External publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.