Core Dimensions of Connectivity in Public Health Collaboratives

Published in: Journal of Public Health Management and Practice, v. 14, no. 5, Sep./Oct. 2008, p. E1-E7

Posted on RAND.org on December 31, 2007

by Danielle M. Varda, Anita Chandra, Stefanie Howard, Nicole Lurie

Read More

Access further information on this document at journals.lww.com

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

A major challenge facing state and local public health agencies is how to partner with other organizations, agencies, and groups to collaboratively address goals in population health while effectively maximizing resource sharing of the partners involved. Today's public health efforts require multiagency partnerships between both governmental and nongovernmental sectors to achieve this mission. However, the frequent reconfiguration of partnerships among government and nongovernmental agencies has left many public health managers struggling to find ways to both develop public health collaboratives and evaluate their success. In this article, we use network theory and social network analysis to outline the core dimensions of connectivity used to measure progress in public health collaboratives. Connectivity is defined as the measured interactions between partners in a collaborative such as the amount and quality of interactions and how these relationships might change over time. The authors also articulate how these measures fit into the overall process of measuring progress in public health collaboratives and end the article with suggestions for future research and development.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation external publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.