The Relationship Between the Dimensions of Change Instrument and Retention in Therapeutic Community Treatment

The Moderating Influence of Time in Treatment

Published In: The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, v. 34, no. 6, Nov. 2008, p. 667-672

Posted on on December 31, 2007

by Jeremy N. V. Miles, Suzanne L. Wenzel, Wallace Mandell

Read More

Access further information on this document at Taylor and Francis Group

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

OBJECTIVES: The Dimensions of Change Instrument (DCI) (1) assesses aspects of the therapeutic community treatment process. More positive scores on two of the eight dimensions of treatment process assessed at the beginning of treatment, Clarity and Safety, and Resident Support, Sharing and Enthusiasm predict retention in treatment at 30, 90, 180, and 270 days as well as overall length of stay. This study explored whether these process subscales assessed at different phases predicted retention at the next phase, and of treatment. METHODS: Five-hundred nineteen individuals, aged 18 to 62, undergoing therapeutic community treatment completed the DCI at baseline, one, three, six, and nine months of the therapeutic community treatment. RESULTS: DCI scale scores at each stage of treatment predicted dropout in the subsequent period. In the early stages of treatment, higher scores predicted a higher probability of retention in the subsequent stage of treatment. In later stages, lower DCI scores predicted a higher probability of retention. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that predictions about retention made using the DCI scale scores are treatment stage dependentb2sthe DCI predicts retention at the next stage but the direction of the scale prediction varies as a function of client tenure in treatment. This suggests that treatment processes that influence clients to remain early in treatment may change their valence for clients more advanced in treatment.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation External publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.