How Quality Improvement Interventions for Depression Affect Stigma Concerns Over Time

A Nine-Year Follow-Up Study

Published in: Psychiatric services, v. 60, no. 2, Feb. 2009, p. 258-261

Posted on on January 01, 2009

by Ruth Klap, Lingqi Tang, Terry L. Schell, Naihua Duan, Kenneth B. Wells, Jeanne Miranda, Cathy D. Sherbourne

Read More

Access further information on this document at Psychiatric services

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

OBJECTIVE: This study examined the long-term impact on stigma concerns of two quality improvement (QI) interventions for depression in primary care. METHODS: Data were from a nine-year follow-up of 805 participants in Partners in Care, a group-level randomized trial comparing patients enrolled in interventions with enhanced resources for therapy (QI-therapy) (N=284) or medication management (QI-meds) (N=267) with those in usual care (N=254). Participants were asked about stigma in regard to friends, health insurance, and employers. RESULTS: Individuals in QI-therapy were significantly less likely than those in usual care and QI-meds to report concerns about friends learning about a history of depression (odds ratio [OR]=.66 and .65, respectively), and those in QI-meds were more likely than those in QI-therapy and usual care to have concerns about getting insurance (OR=1.42 and 1.68, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Quality improvement programs for depression can raise or lower stigma concerns, depending on program design and resources for specific treatments.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation External publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.