Disparities in the Utilization of Live Donor Renal Transplantation

Published in: American Journal of Transplantation, v. 9, no. 5, May 2009, p. 1124-1133

Posted on RAND.org on January 01, 2009

by John L. Gore, G. M. Danovitch, Mark Litwin, P-T T. Pham, Jennifer S. Singer

Read More

Access further information on this document at American Journal of Transplantation

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

Despite universal payer coverage with Medicare, sociodemographic disparities confound the care of patients with renal failure. The authors sought to determine whether adults who realize access to kidney transplantation suffer inequities in the utilization of live donor renal transplantation (LDRT). They identified adults undergoing primary renal transplantation in 2004-2006 from the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS). The authors modeled receipt of live versus deceased donor renal transplant on multilevel multivariate models that examined recipient, center and UNOS region-specific covariates. Among 41 090 adult recipients identified, 39% underwent LDRT. On multivariate analysis, older recipients (OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.56-0.68 for 50-59 year-olds vs.18-39 year-old recipients), those of African American ethnicity (OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.50-0.59 vs. whites) and of lower socioeconomic status (OR 0.72, 95% CI 0.67-0.79 for high school-educated vs. college-educated recipients; OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.71-0.87 for lowest vs. highest income quartile) had lower odds of LDRT. These characteristics accounted for 14.2% of the variation in LDRT, more than recipient clinical variables, transplant center characteristics and UNOS region level variation. The authors identified significant racial and socioeconomic disparities in the utilization of LDRT. Educational initiatives and dissemination of processes that enable increased utilization of LDRT may address these disparities.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation External publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit www.rand.org/about/principles.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.