Adapting CAHPS for an American Indian Population

Published In: Journal of Health Care For the Poor and Underserved, v. 20, no. 3, Aug. 2009, p. 695-712

Posted on on January 01, 2009

by Beverly A. Weidmer, Patrick Johansson, Debbie Dalpoas, David Wharton, Charles Darby, Ron D. Hays

Read More

Access further information on this document at Johns Hopkins University Press

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

OBJECTIVE. Develop a culturally appropriate, reliable, and valid survey that can be used by the Choctaw Nation Health Services (CNHS) to compare patients' health care experiences across CNHS clinics, and to support quality improvement efforts. METHODS. The authors worked with CNHS staff to adapt the CAHPS Clinician and Group Survey for this purpose. They conducted cognitive interviews and a field-test to evaluate the survey. RESULTS. Cognitive testing yielded a survey that covered issues relevant to CNHS patients. Field testing yielded 696 surveys, (58% response rate). Analyses provided support for internal consistency of multi-item scales. Correlations among scales indicate the scales were related to one another but not redundant. DISCUSSION. The CAHPS American Indian Survey is useful for assessing perceptions of care at the clinic level and across different clinics. The close partnership with CNHS helped yield a survey that is scientifically sound, reflects how services are organized and delivered locally, and meets CNHS information needs.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation External publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.