Improving Treatment Seeking Among Adolescents with Depression

Understanding Readiness for Treatment

Published In: The Journal of Adolescent Health, v. 45, no. 5, Nov. 2009, p. 490-498

Posted on on January 01, 2009

by Terri Tanielian, Lisa H. Jaycox, Susan M. Paddock, Anita Chandra, Lisa S. Meredith, M. Audrey Burnam

Read More

Access further information on this document at Elsevier Inc.

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

PURPOSE: To examine readiness for treatment among adolescents with depression in primary care. METHODS: This article draws upon data from 184 depressed patients, aged 13 to 17, who participated in the Teen Depression Awareness Project. Adolescents were screened assessed along a number of domains at baseline and 6 months. RESULTS: Seventy-eight percent of the depressed teens acknowledged they had a problem with depression, yet only 25% were currently getting any sort of counseling or treatment for depression. A total of 40.8% of depressed adolescents were ready to get care, whereas 26.6% were unsure and 32.1% were not ready. Significant differences among these groups were observed for race/ethnicity and household income. Adolescents in the ready group also had more depressive symptoms and lower MHI-5 scores. Being in the ready group versus being unsure was a significant predictor of service use at the 6-month follow-up, as was the average number of days impaired and overall mental health functioning. Race, gender, and age were not significant predictors of readiness, yet average number of depressive symptoms was significantly associated with greater readiness. CONCLUSIONS: Because teens in primary care settings are not seeking mental health treatments even when depression is detected, providers should be mindful that adolescents may be at different stages of recognition and readiness for treatment. Teens who are less ready for care may need follow-up primary care visits or consultation to help them become more active in seeking care.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation External publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.