Moving Los Angeles

Published in: Access, no. 35, Fall 2009, p. 16-24

by Paul Sorensen

Read More

Access further information on this document at

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

Congestion results from an imbalance between the supply of road capacity and the demand for driving during peak travel hours. RAND was recently asked to evaluate and recommend near term strategies that could meaningfully reduce LA's traffic within a period of five years or less. The authors reviewed general insights from the transportation literature on the causes and potential cures for traffic congestion, and diagnosed the specific local conditions that contribute to the notoriously severe congestion in Los Angeles. Few congestion-reduction strategies remain effective over the longer term. This gradual erosion of congestion improvements comes from a phenomenon called "triple convergence." In short, when traffic conditions on a roadway improve in the peak hours, additional travelers tend to converge on the new capacity from (1) other times of travel, (2) other routes of travel, or (3) other modes of travel, slowly eroding the initial benefits from reduced peak-hour congestion. To further inform the development of suitable strategies to reduce congestion in Los Angeles, the authors took a closer look at some of the underlying factors that contribute to the region's congestion and what implications they have for the types of strategies that might offer the greatest prospects for reducing congestion. Los Angeles' high regional population density is a key contributing factor to congestion issues. Land use patterns in Los Angeles are more polycentric (characterized by multiple centers) than in most other major US cities, making it harder to develop a fast and effective transit system that encourages drivers to leave their cars at home. In addition, the fact that population and jobs are spread out across more centers increases the difficulty of attracting sufficient ridership on any given link to justify the significant investment required for transit lines with dedicated right-of-way. The authors developed an integrated policy framework that could offer the greatest prospects for relieving traffic congestion and improving transportation options in the Los Angeles region. The framework encompasses three key components: --Rely on pricing to manage peak-hour demand, raise needed revenue, and promote more efficient use of existing capacity. --Significantly improve transit and other alternative modes. --Continue to improve the efficiency of the road network, but shift the emphasis from moving cars to moving people. A noteworthy characteristic of these recommendations is that many--particularly those that involve pricing--are certain to stir controversy.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation External publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.