Depressive Symptoms and Social Functioning in Peer Relationships as Predictors of Eating Pathology in the Transition to Adulthood
Published In: Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, v. 29, no. 2, Feb. 2010, p. 202-227
Posted on RAND.org on January 01, 2010
Read More
Access further information on this document at the publisher's websiteThis article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.
The current study prospectively examined the independent and potentially interactive roles of social functioning in peer relationships and depressive symptoms in risk for eating pathology (EP). Social functioning in peer relationships was hypothesized to moderate the role of depressive symptoms in conferring risk for EP. This hypothesis was tested in a sample of 140 women, who were assessed over a five-year period during the transition from adolescence to adulthood. The study found that depressive symptoms interacted with romantic relationship quality and romantic attachment, such that women with higher levels of depressive symptoms were at increased risk for EP when they experienced reduced functioning in these romantic domains. The results highlight the importance of considering multiple risk factors in models of EP and suggest that romantic relationships may be particularly important for EP risk during the transition to adulthood.
This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.
This report is part of the RAND Corporation External publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.
Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit www.rand.org/about/principles.
The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.