Cover: Cognitive Behavioral Theories Used to Explain Injection Risk Behavior Among Injection Drug Users

Cognitive Behavioral Theories Used to Explain Injection Risk Behavior Among Injection Drug Users

A Review and Suggestions for the Integration of Cognitive and Environmental Models

Published in: Health Education & Behavior, v. 37, no. 4, Aug. 2010, p. 504-532

Posted on 2010

by Karla Dawn Wagner, Jennifer B. Unger, Ricky N. Bluthenthal, Valentina A. Andreeva, Mary Ann Pentz

Injection drug users (IDUs) are at risk for HIV and viral hepatitis, and risky injection behavior persists despite decades of intervention. Cognitive behavioral theories (CBTs) are commonly used to help understand risky injection behavior. The authors review findings from CBT-based studies of injection risk behavior among IDUs. An extensive literature search was conducted in spring 2007. In total, 33 studies were reviewed - 26 epidemiological and 7 intervention studies. Findings suggest that some theoretical constructs have received fairly consistent support (e.g., self-efficacy, social norms), whereas others have yielded inconsistent or null results (e.g., perceived susceptibility, knowledge, behavioral intentions, perceived barriers, perceived benefits, response efficacy, perceived severity). The authors offer some possible explanations for these inconsistent findings, including differences in theoretical constructs and measures across studies and a need to examine the environmental structures that influence risky behaviors. Greater integration of CBT with a risk environment perspective may yield more conclusive findings and more effective interventions in the future.

This report is part of the RAND external publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.