Cover: Patients' Experiences with Care for Lung Cancer and Colorectal Cancer

Patients' Experiences with Care for Lung Cancer and Colorectal Cancer

Findings from the Cancer Care Outcomes Research and Surveillance Consortium

Published in: Journal of Clinical Oncology, v. 28, no. 27, Sep. 20, 2010, p. 4154-4161

Posted on 2010

by John Z. Ayanian, Alan M. Zaslavsky, Neeraj K. Arora, Katherine L. Kahn, Jennifer Malin, Patricia A. Ganz, Michelle van Ryn, Mark C. Hornbrook, Catarina I. Kiefe, Yulei He, et al.

Purpose: To assess patients' experiences with cancer care, ratings of their quality of care, and correlates of these assessments. Patients and Methods: For 4,093 patients with lung cancer and 3,685 patients with colorectal cancer in multiple US regions and health care delivery systems, we conducted telephone surveys of patients or their surrogates in English, Spanish, or Chinese at 4 to 7 months after diagnosis. The surveys assessed ratings of the overall quality of cancer care and experiences with three domains of interpersonal care (physician communication, nursing care, and coordination and responsiveness of care). Results: English-speaking Asian/Pacific Islander patients and Chinese-speaking patients and those in worse health reported significantly worse adjusted experiences with all three domains of interpersonal care, whereas white, black, and Hispanic patients reported generally similar experiences with interpersonal care. The overall quality of cancer care was rated as excellent by 44.4% of patients with lung cancer and 53.0% of patients with colorectal cancer, and these ratings were most strongly correlated with positive experiences with coordination and responsiveness of care (Spearman rank coefficients of 0.49 and 0.42 for lung and colorectal cancer, respectively). After multivariate adjustment, excellent ratings were less common for each cancer among black patients, English-speaking Asian/Pacific Islander patients, Chinese-speaking patients, and patients reporting worse health status (all P

This report is part of the RAND external publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.