Correlates of Bother Following Treatment for Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer

Published in: The Journal of Urology, v. 184, no. 4, Oct. 2010, p. 1309-1315

Posted on RAND.org on December 31, 2009

by John L. Gore, Kiran Gollapudi, Jonathan Bergman, Lorna Kwan, Tracey L. Krupski, Mark Litwin

Read More

Access further information on this document at www.sciencedirect.com

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

PURPOSE: We determined factors associated with bother, the distress patients experience as a result of functional detriments after treatment for localized prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective cohort of men treated for clinically localized prostate cancer completed a questionnaire comprising the UCLA-PCI, Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36, American Urological Association Symptom Index and Memorial Anxiety Scale for Prostate Cancer fear of recurrence subscale. We used nonlinear mixed models to identify factors associated with severe urinary, sexual and bowel bother. RESULTS: Worse function scores were associated with severe urinary, sexual and bowel bother following treatment (OR 0.88-0.94, p <0.001). Worse American Urological Association Symptom Index score was associated with severe urinary bother (OR 1.22, 95% CI 1.16-1.28). Time since treatment was inversely associated with urinary (OR 0.68, 95% CI 0.54-0.83) and bowel bother (OR 0.63, 95% CI 0.47-0.80) early after treatment but not for the entire 48-month study period. Receipt of concomitant androgen deprivation therapy was not associated with bother 48 months after radiation. CONCLUSIONS: Addressing functional detriment may confer improvement in urinary, sexual and bowel bother. Patient distress related to dysfunction improves with time. Measuring health related quality of life after prostate cancer treatment should incorporate functional and bother assessments.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation External publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit www.rand.org/about/principles.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.