Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.

How to Ensure That They Help Reduce Disparities--Not Increase Them

Published in: Health Affairs, v. 30, no. 10, Oct. 2011, p. 1837-1843

by Robin M. Weinick, Romana Hasnain-Wynia

Read More

Access further information on this document at Health Affairs

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

Despite persistent evidence of continued racial and ethnic disparities in health care, little explicit attention has been paid to how quality improvement activities might affect disparities. As the nation focuses on the practical realities of implementing health care reform and concurrent quality improvement provisions under the Affordable Care Act of 2010, it is important to recognize that overall improvements in the US health care system might not automatically benefit all segments of the population equally. In this article we highlight challenges to ensuring that quality improvement efforts reduce racial and ethnic disparities. These include making certain that quality improvement efforts measure disparities and improvements in them, notwithstanding providers' reputational concerns; that such efforts not create perverse incentives for providers to avoid serving minority patients; that they be applied to institutions where minority patients are most likely to receive care; and that they fully engage minority patients despite language or other barriers. To assist in these efforts, we argue for the development of disparities impact assessments to measure the effect that the Affordable Care Act's quality provisions will have on reducing disparities.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation External publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.