Cost Implications of ACGME's 2011 Changes to Resident Duty Hours and the Training Environment

Published In: Journal of General Internal Medicine, v. 27, no. 2, Feb. 2012, p. 241-249

by Teryl K. Nuckols, Jose J. Escarce

Read More

Access further information on this document at Springer

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

BACKGROUND: In July 2011, the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) will implemented stricter duty-hour limits and related changes to the training environment. This may affect preventable adverse event (PAE) rates. OBJECTIVES: To estimate direct costs under various implementation approaches, and examine net costs to teaching hospitals and cost-effectiveness to society across a range of hypothetical changes in PAEs. DESIGN: A decision-analytical model represented direct costs and PAE rates, mortality, and costs. DATA SOURCES: Published literature and publicly available data. TARGET POPULATION: Patients admitted to hospitals with ACGME-accredited programs. TIME HORIZON: One year. PERSPECTIVES: All teaching hospitals, major teaching hospitals, society. INTERVENTION: ACGME's 2011 Common Program Requirements. OUTCOME MEASURES: Direct annual costs (all accredited hospitals), net cost (major teaching hospitals), cost per death averted (society). RESULTS OF BASE-ANALYSIS: Nationwide, duty-hour changes would cost $177 million annually if interns maintain current productivity, vs. up to $982 million if they transfer work to a mixture of substitutes; training environment changes will cost $204 million. If PAEs decline by 7.2–25.8%, net costs to major teaching hospitals will be zero. If PAEs fall by 3%, the cost to society per death averted would be –$523,000 (95%-confidence interval: –$1.82 million to $685,000) to $2.44 million ($271,000 to $6.91million). If PAEs rise, the policy will be cost-increasing for teaching hospitals and society. RESULTS OF SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS: The total direct annual cost nationwide would be up to $1.34 billion using nurse practitioners/physician assistants, $1.64 billion using attending physicians, $820 million hiring additional residents, vs. 1.42 billion using mixed substitutes. LIMITATIONS: The effect on PAEs is unknown. Data were limited for some model parameters. CONCLUSION: Implementation decisions greatly affect the cost. Unless PAEs decline substantially, teaching hospitals will lose money. If PAEs decline modestly, the requirements might be cost-saving or cost-effective to society.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation External publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.