Characterizing Patterns of Care Using Administrative Claims Data

ADHD Treatment in Children

Published In: Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology, v. 11, no. 3-4, Dec. 2011, p. 115-133

Posted on on December 01, 2011

by Gary R. Klein, Joel B. Greenhouse, Bradley D. Stein, H. J. Seltman

Read More

Access further information on this document at

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

Comparative effectiveness research (CER) is concerned with determining which treatment, among known effective treatments, may provide the most benefit to an individual patient. CER stresses treatment in the "real-world," taking into account multiple sources of patient, provider, and treatment heterogeneity. This is opposed to randomized clinical trials which may enforce strict treatment guidelines and may exclude patient populations from participation. One way to access treatment outcomes in these general settings is through administrative databases such as Medicaid claims. While they usually have variables linking records to individual patients over time, we believe a strategy that may aid in CER is to use administrative databases longitudinally. We describe two approaches that can be used with administrative data to characterize longitudinal patterns of treatment, trajectory analysis and multi-state Markov models. We apply these models to Medicaid retail pharmacy claims and behavioral service claims to describe the attention deficit hyperactivity disorder treatment patterns in youths in general clinical settings.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation external publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.