Techno-polymers in Firearms Manufacturing

Challenges and Implications for Marking, Record-Keeping, and Tracing

Published in: Behind the Curve: New Technologies, New Control Challenges / edited by Benjamin King and Glenn McDonald (Geneva, Switzerland: Small Arms Survey, Feb. 2015), Occasional paper 32, Chapter 1, p. 5-22

Posted on on May 01, 2015

by Giacomo Persi Paoli

Read More

Access further information on this document at

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

Over the last three decades, the arms industry has been characterized by a transition from metal to polymers in the manufacture of an increasing number of firearm parts and components--a trend that shows no signs of abating. Motivated to improve performance and to reduce costs, the industrial sector, including the arms industry, continues to prioritize research and development on new materials. Despite this development, the intrinsic differences between metal and polymers, and the related technical challenges for marking them, were overlooked when the UN Firearms Protocol and the International Tracing Instrument (ITI) were negotiated. To date, these agreements represent the only international instruments providing specific indications--either as requirement or as recommendation--on firearm marking, record-keeping, and tracing. Yet the oversight regarding an established industrial trend poses important challenges to the implementation of key provisions of these instruments. This paper provides an overview of the key elements related to the use of industrial polymers in arms manufacturing, highlighting the challenges that such materials pose to the effective implementation of the ITI and the Firearms Protocol. Although several firearms parts and components are often manufactured with one or more types of polymer, this paper focuses on polymer frames and receivers as they typically bear unique markings that are critical for the unique identification of a weapon.

Research conducted by

This report is part of the RAND Corporation External publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.