An Argument Approach to Observation Protocol Validity

Published In: Educational Assessment, v. 17, no. 2-3, Apr. 2012, p. 62-87

Posted on RAND.org on April 01, 2012

by Courtney A. Bell, Drew H. Gitomer, Daniel F. McCaffrey, Bridget K. Hamre, Robert C. Pianta, Yi Qi

Read More

Access further information on this document at www.tandfonline.com

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

This article develops a validity argument approach for use on observation protocols currently used to assess teacher quality for high-stakes personnel and professional development decisions. After defining the teaching quality domain, we articulate an interpretive argument for observation protocols. To illustrate the types of evidence that might compose a validity argument, we draw on data from a validity study of the Classroom Assessment Scoring System for secondary classrooms. Based on data from 82 Algebra classrooms, we illustrate how data from observation scores, value-added models, generalizability studies, and measures of teacher knowledge, student achievement, and teacher and student beliefs could be used to build a validity argument for observation protocols. Strengths and limitations of the validity argument approach as well as the issues the approach raises for observation protocol validity research are considered.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation external publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.