Do Public Reports of Provider Performance Make Their Data and Methods Available and Accessible?

Published In: Medical Care Research and Review, v. 71, no. 5, Suppl., Oct. 2014, p. 81S-96S

by Cheryl L. Damberg, David Hyman, Julie France

Read More

Access further information on this document at Sage Publications

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

Research Question

  1. Are public websites that report provider performance transparent about the data and methods used to generate provider performance scores?

Public reports of provider performance are widespread and the methods used to generate the provider ratings differ across the sponsoring entities. We examined 115 hospital and 27 physician public reports to determine whether report sponsors made the methods used to score providers available and accessible. While nearly all websites made transparent some of the methods used to assess provider performance, we found substantial variation in the extent to which they fully adhered to recommended methods elements identified in the Consumer-Purchaser Disclosure Project's Patient Charter for performance reporting. Most public reports provided descriptions of the data sources, whether measures were endorsed, and the attribution approach. Least often made transparent were methods descriptions related to advanced provider review and reconsideration of results, reliability assessment, and case-mix adjustment. Future research should do more to identify the core elements that would lead consumer end users to have confidence in public reports.

Key Findings

  • Most websites describe some of the methods used to assess performance.
  • Transparency varies across sites, especially regarding how providers can review or correct results, how case mix adjustments are made, and how the reliability of measures is assessed.

Recommendation

  • Future research should identify the information consumers consider vital in order to understand how providers are being measured and scored.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation External publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit www.rand.org/about/research-integrity.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.