Don't Middle Your MIDs

Regression to the Mean Shrinks Estimates of Minimally Important Differences

Published in: Quality of Life Research, v. 23, no. 1, Feb. 2014, p. 1-4

Posted on RAND.org on February 01, 2014

by Peter M. Fayers, Ron D. Hays

Read More

Access further information on this document at Quality of Life Research

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

Minimal important differences (MIDs) for patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are often estimated by selecting a clinical variable to serve as an anchor. Then, differences in the clinical anchor regarded as clinically meaningful or important can be used to estimate the corresponding value of the PRO. Although these MID values are sometimes estimated by regression techniques, we show that this is a biased procedure and should not be used; alternative methods are proposed.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation external publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.