Perspective

Some Possible Pitfalls in the Design and Use of PERT Networking

Published in: Journal of the Academy of Management, v. 8, no. 2, June 1965, p. 139-145

Posted on RAND.org on June 01, 1965

by L. S. Hill

Read More

Access further information on this document at amj.aom.org

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

This article presents a diagnostic review of the PERT (Program Evaluation and Review Technique) technique, and defines the technique and outlines some of the problematic aspects of designing a PERT Cost system that may have an impact on schedule and cost performance. The author discusses observations on the construction of proposal networks and pitfalls in networking, such as the sophistry of the black boxes, the vendor nose constraining the vertical fin design, grouping of engineering releases, waiting time, the reversal of constraints, acceptable level of technical risk, and updating of subsidiary networks. He reminds users of the PERT technique that a sound, synthesized system design is complex and necessitates adherence to the prescribed procedures.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation external publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.