Cover: Contextual Predictors of Cumulative Biological Risk

Contextual Predictors of Cumulative Biological Risk

Segregation and Allostatic Load

Published in: Social Science Quarterly, v. 92, no. 5, Dec. 2011, p. 1338-1362

Posted on Dec 1, 2011

by Anna Bellatorre, Brian Karl Finch, D. Phuong Do, Chloe E. Bird, Audrey N. Beck

OBJECTIVES: Segregation is considered to be a fundamental cause of race/ethnic disparities in health. However, very few studies have tested whether levels of segregation are related to health outcomes using multilevel data and appropriate methodologies. In this study, we investigate the relationships between two distinct dimensions of segregation and allostatic load to determine whether the experiences of individuals in segregated neighborhoods are related to allostatic load as a possible predisease indicator. METHODS: To test our hypotheses, we utilized publicly available data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey III, 1988–1994. We utilized random-intercept hierarchical generalized Poisson regression models to conduct our multivariate analyses. RESULTS: We find that inflammatory response is related to both the evenness and exposure domains of segregation. That is, both the unequal distribution of minority groups over areal units as well as the degree of potential contact between minority and majority group members are related to these predisease pathways. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we build on prior research by Massey (2004) to investigate the relationships between two distinct dimensions of segregation and allostatic load. Our results indicate that segregation is a significant predictor of allostatic load, net of individual-level characteristics.

This report is part of the RAND external publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.