Understanding the Quality of Implementation in Bolsa Familia

A Look Inside the 'Black Box' of a Conditional Cash Transfer Programme

Published in: The 7th ECPR General Conference, Sciences Po Bordeaux, Sep. 4-7, 2013

Posted on RAND.org on April 06, 2016

by Christian Van Stolk, Sunil Patil

Read More

Access further information on this document at r4d.dfid.gov.uk

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

This paper aims to promote a greater understanding of how the 'black box' of implementation in a conditional cash transfer (CCT) programme interacts with the quality of implementation. The 'black box' of implementation refers here to programme and external factors that could impact the outcome of the programme such as: the capacity of municipalities; the supply of services; the integration of services; geography; political motivations; levels of poverty; and urban versus rural context. By taking data from federal Brazilian datasets related to these factors and administrative data on the quality of implementation from the Bolsa Familia (BF) programme, this paper models associations between the key variables. The findings suggest some nuanced findings on capacity and the nature of poverty in municipalities, which seems to suggest that overall resources are perhaps less important than the approach taken in a municipality to BF implementation. The supply-side appears to matter, both in terms of the quality of services associated with beneficiaries meeting BF conditionalities as well as how they are provided. As a result, the paper suggests that those designing CCTs should perhaps invest more in the supply of services. Bolsa Familia in Brazil and similar CCT programmes have been copied in Latin America and other continents and countries (e. g. the Philippines, Indonesia, Uganda, India). The evidence on CCTs increasingly concludes that they are successful in raising household expenditure and promote the take-up of health and education services, contributing in some cases to significant reductions in poverty rates. Impact evaluations have increased the understanding of the relationship of the coverage of beneficiaries, targeting of households and incentive levels (level of benefits) in a CCT programme with the effectiveness of these programmes at household level. 1 However, the understanding of which programme and contextual factors influence the success of these programmes remains limited. This in turn limits knowledge on what works in what context, which is of crucial importance as CCT programmes spread across the globe. This paper seeks to shed further light into the 'black box 'of a CCT by reviewing relevant Brazilian federal datasets and modelling associations between key variables. The 'black box' of implementation refers to a range of programme and external factors that could impact the outcome of a CCT programme. Programme variables can refer to the capacity and resources of those implementing BF as well as the provision of health and education services that beneficiaries engage with. External variables consist of political, demographic and geographic factors. With regards to outcomes, the paper looks at the municipal level of implementation and examines the quality of decision-making at the local level in registering beneficiaries and monitoring conditionalities. In short, the paper wants to understand better how the decentralised approach used in Brazil is contributing to programme outcomes.

Research conducted by

This report is part of the RAND Corporation External publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit www.rand.org/about/principles.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.