A Learning Behavioral Health Care System

Opportunities to Enhance Research

Published in: Psychiatric Services, 2016

Posted on RAND.org on May 09, 2016

by Bradley D. Stein, Alyce S. Adams, David A. Chambers

Read More

Access further information on this document at Psychiatric Services

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

Research Questions

  1. How can a learning behavioral health system help address service delivery challenges?
  2. What are the opportunities and challenges in establishing such a system?

Sweeping changes in health care financing combined with the increased use of technology across health care systems are making it possible to address long-standing challenges to the behavioral health services delivery system. This Open Forum outlines opportunities and challenges facing health services researchers in this rapidly changing landscape. Inspired by a 2012 report by the Institute of Medicine, the authors discuss innovative research endeavors, promising study designs, and challenges involved in integrating high-impact behavioral health services research within a learning behavioral health care framework. The Open Forum concludes with a discussion of the critical next steps in this process: building consensus around common metrics for high-quality care, relevant outcomes, and contextual factors; connecting researchers to community and clinical settings; creating a data commons to pool information across sites; and designing and evaluating evidence-based decision support tools to drive improved care and outcomes.

Key Findings

  • Advances in technology and changes to the organization, delivery, and financing of health care could present opportunities to improve behavioral health care.
  • A learning health system would use technologies that can collect and help clinicians interpret data and embedded tools to support patient management.
  • Both care experiences and research studies would feed into a continuously updated system to help clinicians understand the utility of different approaches to diagnosis, treatment, and prevention.
  • Researchers, providers, patients, and health system leaders would need to collaborate on the design, development, and appraisal of a learning health system to ensure cross-system comparisons and relevance to population segments.
  • Goals and priorities of researchers and clinicians can create tension between the desire for rigorous methods versus the urgent need for real-world solutions.
  • Tools that support clinical decisionmaking can help improve care by translating research findings into clinical information.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation External publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit www.rand.org/about/principles.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.