Including supplemental insurance payments in the calculation of Medicare patients' out-of-pocket costs substantially lowers the proportion that exceed the Part A deductible, in comparison to previous analyses.
Supplemental Insurance Reduces Out-of-Pocket Costs in Medicare Observation Services
Published in: Journal of Hospital Medicine, v. 11, no. 7, July 2016, p. 502-504
Posted on RAND.org on July 14, 2016
Read More
Access further information on this document at Journal of Hospital MedicineThis article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.
Research Question
- Does the inclusion of supplemental insurance payments in the calculation of out-of-pocket hospital costs change the proportion of beneficiaries incurring excessive out-of-pocket costs?
Including supplemental insurance payments in the calculation of Medicare patients' out-of-pocket costs substantially lowers the proportion that exceed the Part A deductible, in comparison to previous analyses.
Key Findings
- Prior analyses concluded that 6 to 10 percent of observational hospital stays for Medicare patients resulted in out-of-pocket costs that exceeded the Part A deductible, but these analyses did not include supplemental insurance adjustments or payments in their calculations.
- About 20 percent of beneficiaries in this study did not have supplemental insurance; their mean out-of-pocket costs were $537.
- About 80 percent of beneficiaries had supplemental insurance from private or state-based sources; their mean out-of-pocket costs were $45 for private, $168 for state-based supplemental insurance.
- Factoring in supplemental insurance payments, the percentage of out-of-pocket costs from observational hospital stays exceeding the Part A deductible were 0.3 and 3.5 percent for beneficiaries with private and state-based supplemental insurance, respectively.
Recommendation
Future attempts to estimate Medicare beneficiaries' out-of-pocket costs should include supplemental insurance adjustments or payments.
This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.
This report is part of the RAND Corporation External publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.
Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit www.rand.org/about/principles.
The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.