Many physicians who prescribe buprenorphine are prescribing below the patient limits historically allowed under U.S. law.

Physician Capacity to Treat Opioid Use Disorder with Buprenorphine-Assisted Treatment

Published in: JAMA, v. 316, no. 11, Sep. 2016, p. 1211-1212

Posted on RAND.org on September 28, 2016

by Bradley D. Stein, Mark J. Sorbero, Andrew W. Dick, Rosalie Liccardo Pacula, Rachel M. Burns, Adam J. Gordon

Read More

Access further information on this document at JAMA

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

Research Question

  1. Are limits on the number of patients that an approved physician can treat with buprenorphine (for treating opioid disorder) a barrier to treatment?

Buprenorphine, a medication effective in treating individuals with opioid use disorders, can be prescribed in the United States by addiction specialists or by physicians who complete an 8-hour course and obtain a US Drug Enforcement Administration waiver. Waivered prescribers have been restricted to treating up to 30 patients with an opioid use disorder concurrently; after a year, physicians could request that the limit be increased to 100 patients. Policy makers have prioritized increasing capacity to provide buprenorphine to fight the opioid epidemic but lack adequate information about how to do so effectively. Patient censuses of buprenorphine prescribers were examined to provide information on whether patient limits have been a barrier to buprenorphine treatment.

Key Findings

  • Current limits (which allow 30 patients to be treated concurrently, with the possibility of an increase to 100 after one year of practice) do not appear to be a barrier to patient access to buprenorphine treatment.
  • Monthly patient censuses for 3234 buprenorphine prescribers with 245,016 patients showed that most approved physicians were treating numbers of patients well below the current limits: More than 20% treated 3 or fewer patients, and fewer than 10% treated more than 75 patients.
  • Novice prescribers cited insufficient access to more experienced prescribers and insufficient access to substance abuse counseling for patients as barriers to treating more patients.

Recommendations

  • Such barriers might be addressed by web-based or telecounseling for patients and by programs providing mentoring and telephone consultation from more experienced prescribers.
  • Strategies to help current prescribers treat more patients safely and effectively could complement policy initiatives designed to increase access to treatment by increasing patient limits and number of waivered prescribers.
Access further information on this document at JAMA

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation External publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit www.rand.org/about/research-integrity.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.