Integrative Pain Management Centers in the Military

The Challenges

Ian D. Coulter, Lara Hilton, Joan A G Walter, Kathleen S. Brown

ResearchPosted on rand.org Oct 10, 2016Published in: Military Medicine, v. 181, no. 9, Sep. 2016, p. 1033-1039

Objectives

Biomedicine and complementary and alternative medicine are forming new relationships, under the rubric of integrative medicine. Recently, the military has adopted integrative medicine as the model for pain management. An evaluation was conducted on an integrative model for pain management at a major Army medical center to determine the distinct challenges that were encountered during the early stages of this integrative program.

Methods

The design is a case study evaluation. Qualitative data were analyzed to determine whether the outcomes in terms of processes were in harmony with the program's mission. Study participants were patients (34), referring providers (25), program staff (20), administrators (18), and related medical center leadership (6).

Results

The study uncovered the following challenges: misaligned culture and mission, resources, the valuing of services (relative value units), systemic transition, patient throughput, and stigma associated with the focus and location of the program in a psychology department.

Conclusions

These challenges prevented the program from fully achieving its mission and potential. Although integrative medicine might be the appropriate model for pain management in the military, the structural and process elements to bring it about are not yet in place or fully understood.

Topics

Document Details

  • Availability: Non-RAND
  • Year: 2016
  • Pages: 7
  • Document Number: EP-66665

This publication is part of the RAND external publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.