Is More Always Better in Designing Workplace Wellness Programs?
A Comparison of Wellness Program Components Versus Outcomes
Published in: Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Volume 58, Number 10, October 2016, pages 987-993. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000000848
Posted on RAND.org on April 28, 2017
Read MoreAccess further information on this document at Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine
This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.
Assess whether adding more components to a workplace wellness program is associated with better outcomes by measuring the relationship of program components to one another and to employee participation and perceptions of program effectiveness.
Data came from a 2014 survey of 24,393 employees of 81 employers about services offered, leadership, incentives, and promotion. Logistic regressions were used to model the relationship between program characteristics and outcomes.
Components individually are related to better outcomes, but this relationship is weaker in the presence of other components and non-significant for incentives. Within components, a moderate level of services and work time participation opportunities are associated with higher participation and effectiveness.
The "more of everything" approach does not appear to be advisable for all programs. Programs should focus on providing ample opportunities for employees to participate and initiatives like results-based incentives.