Impact of a Mental Health Based Primary Care Program on Emergency Department Visits and Inpatient Stays

Published in: General Hospital Psychiatry, Volume 52 (May-June 2018), Pages 8-13. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2018.02.008

Posted on RAND.org on April 10, 2018

by Joshua Breslau, Emily Leckman-Westin, Bing Han, Riti Pritam, Diana Guarasi, Marcela Horvitz-Lennon, Deborah M. Scharf, Molly T. Finnerty, Hao Yu

Read More

Access further information on this document at General Hospital Psychiatry

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

Objective

Integrating primary care services into specialty mental health clinics has been proposed as a method for improving health care utilization for medical conditions by adults with serious mental illness. This paper examines the impact of a mental health based primary care program on emergency department (ED) visits and hospitalizations.

Method

The program was implemented in seven New York City outpatient mental health clinics in two waves. Medicaid claims were used to identify patients treated in intervention clinics and a control group of patients treated in otherwise similar clinics in New York City. Impacts of the program were estimated using propensity score adjusted difference-in-differences models on a longitudinally followed cohort.

Results

Hospital stays for medical conditions increased significantly in intervention clinics relative to control clinics in both waves (ORs=1.21 (Wave 1) and 1.33 (Wave 2)). ED visits for behavioral health conditions decreased significantly relative to controls in Wave 1 (OR=0.89), but not in Wave 2. No other significant differences in utilization trends between the intervention and control clinics were found.

Conclusion

Introducing primary care services into mental health clinics may increase utilization of inpatient services, perhaps due to newly identified unmet medical need in this population.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation External publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit www.rand.org/about/principles.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.