Indirect Estimation of Race/Ethnicity for Survey Respondents Who Do Not Report Race/Ethnicity

Jacob W. Dembosky, Amelia Haviland, Ann C. Haas, Katrin Hambarsoomian, Robert Weech-Maldonado, Shondelle Wilson-Frederick, Sarah J. Gaillot, Marc N. Elliott

ResearchPosted on rand.org Sep 17, 2019Published in: Medical Care, Volume 57, Issue 5, pages e28-e33 (May 2019). doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001011

Background

Researchers are increasingly interested in measuring race/ethnicity, but some survey respondents skip race/ethnicity items.

Objectives

The main objectives of this study were to investigate the extent to which racial/ethnic groups differ in skipping race/ethnicity survey items, the degree to which this reflects reluctance to disclose race/ethnicity, and the utility of imputing missing race/ethnicity.

Research Design

We applied a previously developed method for imputing race/ethnicity from administrative data (Medicare Bayesian Improved Surname and Geocoding 2.0) to data from a national survey where race/ethnicity was usually self-reported, but was sometimes missing. A linear mixed-effects regression model predicted the probability of self-reporting race/ethnicity from imputed racial/ethnic probabilities.

Subjects

In total, 508,497 Medicare beneficiaries responding to the 2013-2014 Medicare Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems surveys were included in this study.

Measures

Self-reported race/ethnicity and estimated racial/ethnic probabilities.

Results

Black beneficiaries were most likely to not self-report their race/ethnicity (6.6%), followed by Hispanic (4.7%) and Asian/Pacific Islander (4.7%) beneficiaries. Non-Hispanic whites were the least likely to skip these items (3.2%). The 3.7% overall rate of missingness is similar to adjacent demographic items. General patterns of item missingness rather than a specific reluctance to disclose race/ethnicity appears to explain the elevated rate of missing race/ethnicity among Asian/Pacific Islander and Hispanic beneficiaries and most but not all among Black beneficiaries. Adding imputed cases to the data set did not substantially alter the estimated overall racial/ethnic distribution, but it did modestly increase sample size and statistical power.

Conclusions

It may be worthwhile to impute race/ethnicity when this information is unavailable in survey data sets due to item nonresponse, especially when missingness is high.

Topics

Document Details

  • Publisher: Wolters Kluwer
  • Availability: Non-RAND
  • Year: 2019
  • Pages: 6
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.7249/pubs
  • Document Number: EP-67950

This publication is part of the RAND external publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.