Building Bridges Across Clinical Registries
ResearchPosted on rand.org Jan 14, 2021Published in: Anesthesia & Analgesia, Volume 125, Issue 2, pages 689–691 (August 2017). doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002005
ResearchPosted on rand.org Jan 14, 2021Published in: Anesthesia & Analgesia, Volume 125, Issue 2, pages 689–691 (August 2017). doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002005
We often hear that Big Data will usher in an era of precision medicine and predictive analytics. But for precision medicine and predictive analytics to become mainstream, we need an infrastructure that connects the massive number of digital breadcrumbs—Big Data—generated by individual patients over their lifetimes. Although current clinical registries do not contain Big Data, we expect that as registries expand to become more population based and capture increasingly more granular and longitudinal data, the explosion in health care data will offer unique opportunities to improve health care outcomes. There are now >80 clinical registries listed in the National Quality Registry Network. Unfortunately, the depressing reality is that we have yet to harness the power of existing Small Data because most clinical registries exist in stand-alone silos that are not connected to one another.
This publication is part of the RAND external publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.
RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.