Reentry, Desistance, and Identity Achievement

Published in: American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research website (2021)

Posted on on August 31, 2021

by Shawn D. Bushway

Read More

Access further information on this document at

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

This report is based on two foundational beliefs: Reentry policy needs to be based on a theoretical desistance model, and the empirical evidence supports a desistance model that involves movement toward a positive pro-social identity. The report presents two key observations based on these tenets. First, if people are participating in identity transformations while in prison, reentry policy should be structured to honor and support this process. Second, policymakers may be able to instigate or encourage identity transformation with a better understanding of the developmental processes involved in identity achievement.

This is not new science; identity achievement is a foundational idea in developmental psychology. What is new is the idea that we should try to build prisons that respect the developmental processes prisoners experience before they achieve positive pro-social identities. Central to this idea is that prisoners must have the chance to explore different opportunities, similar to how college students are given the freedom and encouragement to explore different ideas and manifestations of prospective adult identities. Much work needs to be done to fully develop this idea. The report concludes with a discussion of three key components of any new environment: respect, relationships, and learning.

Research conducted by

This report is part of the RAND Corporation External publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.