Artificial Intelligence and the Ethics and Practice of Evaluation

Ananda S. Millard, Tom Ling

ResearchPosted on rand.org Sep 14, 2026Published in: From Algorithms to Evidence: Using GenAI in Evaluation Practice, Chapter 32, pages 343-358 (2026). DOI: 10.4324/9781003799139-32

Artificial intelligence (AI) presents both profound opportunities and unprecedented challenges for the evaluation profession. These remain insufficiently examined. As is evident from previous chapters, evaluators embrace AI for data analysis, evidence synthesis, and decision support. This chapter examines three critical consequences: the reconfiguration of agency and responsibility; the epistemic risks of relinquishing human interpretive authority; and the impacts of Global North dominance in AI development. This chapter argues for engaging with AI ethics before AI-led reasoning becomes institutionally embedded. We suggest that evaluative practice risks evolving from reflective human inquiry into procedural algorithmic compliance, altering evidence-based decision-making, learning, and accountability.

Topics

Document Details

  • Publisher: Taylor & Francis Group
  • Availability: Non-RAND
  • Year: 2026
  • Pages: 16
  • Document Number: EP-71488

Research conducted by

This publication is part of the RAND external publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.