Is There a Deep-Pocket Bias in the Tort System?

The Concern over Biases Against Deep-Pocket Defendants

Robert J. MacCoun

ResearchPublished 1993

There is a wide-spread perception that America’s tort system is biased against so-called deep-pocket defendants — defendants such as corporations, governments, and wealthy individuals who have extensive financial resources. This paper summarizes what we know and don’t know about deep-pocket biases. Both archival analyses of twenty years of verdicts in Cook county, Illinois, and mock jury experimentation indicate that in similar cases, juries do treat corporations differently from individuals. Juries are more likely to find corporations liable and award plaintiffs more money. However, other mock jury experiments show that rich individuals are treated more like poor individuals than like corporations. Thus, jurors do treat corporations differently, but not because of wealth. Future research is necessary to clarify what causes juries to treat corporations differently.

Topics

Document Details

  • Copyright: RAND Corporation
  • Availability: Web-Only
  • Year: 1993
  • Paperback Pages: 6
  • Document Number: IP-130

Citation

RAND Style Manual
MacCoun, Robert J., Is There a Deep-Pocket Bias in the Tort System? The Concern over Biases Against Deep-Pocket Defendants, RAND Corporation, IP-130, 1993. As of September 5, 2024: https://www.rand.org/pubs/issue_papers/IP130.html
Chicago Manual of Style
MacCoun, Robert J., Is There a Deep-Pocket Bias in the Tort System? The Concern over Biases Against Deep-Pocket Defendants. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 1993. https://www.rand.org/pubs/issue_papers/IP130.html.
BibTeX RIS

This publication is part of the RAND issue paper series. The issue paper was a product of RAND from 1993 to 2003 that contained early data analysis, an informed perspective on a topic, or a discussion of research directions, not necessarily based on published research. The issue paper was meant to be a vehicle for quick dissemination intended to stimulate discussion in a policy community.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.