Mexican immigration, U.S. investment, and U.S.-Mexican relations
ResearchPublished 1990
This report presents an analysis of the potential effects of the U.S. Immigration Reform and Control Act (IRCA) of 1986 on U.S.-Mexican relations. To date, IRCA has been implemented pragmatically, but it reflects anxieties in the United States, arouses concern in Mexico, and may lead to actions that damage bilateral relations. However, the issues that Americans raise about immigration are similar to those that Mexicans raise about foreign investment. Parallels also appear in the laws each country has enacted to deal with these issues. The authors conclude that nationalist mindsets in both countries should be questioned. They suggest that the flows of immigration and investment may be equally good or bad for both countries. As economic and social integration deepen the two countries' interdependence, harmonized views will be needed about both flows in both countries.
Document Details
- Copyright: RAND Corporation
- Availability: Web Only
- Year: 1990
- Pages: 87
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.7249/pubs
- Document Number: JRI-8
Citation
RAND Style Manual
Chicago Manual of Style
This publication is part of the RAND joint report immigration series. The joint report was a product of RAND from 1988 to 1993 that included documents published jointly with other organizations and presented major research findings and final research.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.